Monday, October 29, 2018

20 Photos - Week One (Theme; Design)

Shutter Speed: 1/100
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/100
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/100
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/200
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/200
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/100
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/80
Aperture: F18
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/50
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/50
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/160
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/160
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/60
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/125
Aperture: F5.6
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/80
Aperture: F13
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/160
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/160
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/160
Aperture: F9
ISO: 1600

Shutter Speed: 1/200
Aperture: F6.3
ISO: 100

Shutter Speed: 1/400
Aperture: F6.3
ISO: 280

Shutter Speed: 1/30
Aperture: F4
ISO: 2200




Lighting in Photography - DJ Pfeiffer







Back Lighting
Shutter Speed: 1/60
Aperture: F32
ISO: 1600
Side Lighting
Shutter Speed: 1/60
Aperture: F22
ISO: 1600

Top Lighting
Shutter Speed: 1/60
Aperture: F25
ISO: 1600

Top Lighting with Diffusion (Theatrical Lighting Gel R59)
Shutter Speed: 1/30
Aperture: F4
ISO: 1600



Foot Lighting (Lighting from below)
Shutter Speed: 1/30
Aperture: F4
ISO: 1600

Monday, October 15, 2018

Exhibition Review - DJ Pfeiffer

DJ Pfeiffer

I visited the Cristin Tierney Gallery to view the exhibition entitled Under Construction, comprised of pieces from Janet Biggs, Victor Burgin, Peter Campus, Neil Goldurg, and Malia Jensen. At the venue artwork is placed upon plain white walls, likely to allow the photos to pop out to the viewer, like a window into another world. I found it helped to prevent clashing between the colors of the photos and the walls themselves, making the experience feel more tranquil. The work presented focused on how society perceives individuals, in a way that strives to question stereotypes. The press release, for example, states, “Cindy Sherman’s Untitled Film Still #32, 1979, comments on the stereotypical way women were presented in media while Neil Goldberg’s series "The Gay Couples of Whole Foods" engages stereotypes of habits of gay men woven with established corporate cultural values and identity.” The work of each artist shares the similarity in that they focus on life, but it was interesting to see the different aspects of life focused on by different individuals. For example, Cindy Sherman had a piece in which a woman lights a cigarette in black and white, while Neil Goldburg offered a collage of gay couples with groceries, and Janet Biggs sported a more abstract piece of two astronauts atop a dirt hill. Each focused on humanity, but in such diverse ways. The dramatic black and white, the mundane regularity of grocery shopping, and the adventurous nature of an astronaut - all individual aspects of human nature. However, out of all the pieces mentioned above - in addition to those not yet mentioned - I found the most interesting piece to be Martha Rosler’s Vital Statistics of a Citizen. This four by three film taken in 1977 caught my eye at the moment when researchers measure a woman’s breast, as it managed to encapsulate two major descriptive factors of society; the objectification of women based upon biological differences, as well as the general priorities of a society influenced by a strong surge of scientific research in its infancy. While all of the pieces presented offered an interesting story and view into different aspects of societal nature, none seemed to be as seamless as Rosler’s was. It was really interesting to see this exhibition as most of the work I focus on tends to be landscapes and close shots of flora and fauna. Seeing all the different intellectual and artistic ideas that can be explored with photography of people gave me ideas on how to branch out my own interests in a more flexible manner than I had previously believed, and as such I plan to look into the similar work and additional pieces of the artists - specifically Biggs, Sherman, and Rosler.

PDF of Press Release (Link Below);
http://www.cristintierney.com/attachment/en/5374ea09a9aa2cc9708b4568/Press/5b92a1351bc1385f25342b88

Assignment 8 - DJ Pfeiffer

Repetition (Rack of Clothes)
1/25, F5, ISO 1600
NOTES: Poor focus due in part to change in camera settings

Shape (Graphite Fingerprint on Plain Paper)
1/30, F5.3, ISO 400
NOTES: Fingerprint difficult to see due to poor graphite quality

Line (Shelves)
1/80, F3.5, ISO 1600

Contrast (Shoe)
1/60, F5.6, ISO 3200

Complementary Colors (Blue and Green Tile Floor)
1/100, F5.6, ISO 1600

Monochromatic/Analogous Color (Red and Green Pencil Lead Container)
1/80, F5.6, ISO 3200

Rule of Thirds (Detail Carving on Couch)
1/50, F5.6, ISO 6400

Texture (3D Printed T-Rex Jaw)
1/200, F5.6, ISO 1600

Monday, October 1, 2018

Assessment 3 - DJ Pfeiffer

Largest Opening Shot
Aperture: F4
Shutter Speed: 1/1000
ISO: 400

Smallest Opening Shot
Aperture: F22
Shutter Speed: 1/40
ISO: 400

Reading Assessment 2


  1. What is the author’s thesis? → The author’s thesis is that good interpretation does not only inform the reader/listener about the subject of the photo, but also conveys the story deep within the art.
  2. What examples does he use to support the thesis? → Barrett talks about how Sonstag, in her critique of Wall’s work, did not provide more information than required preventing the reader from being distracted from the nature and subject of the piece. Additionally he focused on how she used descriptive language to explain what the piece was aiming to achieve, thus relaying the inner story of the art to her readers.
  3. In your own words, how does Barrett define interpretation? → Barrett defines interpretation as taking a photograph and analyzing it in order to determine it’s message, meaning, expression, and influences amongst plenty others. He says that, as a critic, interpretation is relaying the point, mood, sense, meaning or tone - be it in written or verbal form.
  4. According to Barrett, why is interpretation important in criticism of photographs? →  It helps us get an understanding of what the critic sees, what they feel - they also inform us of how it was made, fits together, and affects the subject. It offers a new language to something we may have always understood in only one way.
  5. In Chapter 3 Barrett gives examples of various interpretations from different “interpretive perspectives” and “interpretive strategies” - choose one that stood out, surprised you, or interested you in some way and discuss why. → Interpretive perspectives interested me the most, because it described how much a critic could influence a reader’s opinion. Before I read this, I had always looked at critic reviews as descriptive essays when they were in fact persuasive essays.
  6. In your own words, what is/are the main point(s) the author is trying to make in the section “‘Right’ Interpretations”? → His point focuses on the idea that there are not “True” and “False” interpretations, rather there are convincing and unconvincing interpretations and that there is merit in listening to another person’s interpretation even if you do not share their opinion.
  7. In your own words, what is/are the main point(s) the author is trying to make in the section “Interpretations and the Artist’s Intent”? → Intentionalism faces problems in regard to the fact that it is sometimes difficult to find out what the artist’s intentions were - if they had any at all. Barrett stated that he felt interpretation was something that should be left to the viewer, as the opposite allows their opinion to be changed and remove the much needed skill of interpretation from them.
  8. Write about two other key points that you learned from this week’s reading. → I learned that there is an important distinction to be made between the terms significance and meaning, the former of which is much more personal in regards to the individual’s interpretations. I also was unaware that interpretations are overseen by a community, similar in practice to the scientific community as they both analyze the works of others and deem whether or not they are viable to be included.
  9. Summarize - what is the author’s conclusion? → Barrett’s writing focuses on the intricacies of interpretation, how they can shape our own opinions and interpretations, and how important it is to consider the interpretations of other individuals. These interpretations help us to better appreciate and understand art, in addition to increasing one's ability to create proper dialogue about the art and it's meaning in the way that a critic might.